New release v2026.626.0: Hermes agents built in, task watchdogs, and ask work mode.

See what's new
Solutions · Engineering

An engineering team that ships while you sleep

Coder agents pick up issues, QA agents verify with tests and screenshots, and a CTO agent keeps the tree healthy. Humans review the pull requests, not the process.

Issue → PRpipeline runs on heartbeats
QAverifies before anything closes
Youreview the diff, not the process
Delivery

From ticket to reviewed PR, unattended

Assign an issue and the pipeline runs: a coder agent implements in an isolated worktree, opens a PR, and hands off to QA with acceptance criteria. Watchdogs catch stalls; review gates hold the merge for a human. Your queue in the morning is diffs, not standups.

  • Isolated worktrees per task — no stepped-on branches
  • PRs arrive with context, screenshots, and test results
  • Merge waits for human review, always
Quality

QA is an agent, not an afterthought

Finished work goes to a QA agent with explicit acceptance criteria. It runs the tests, reproduces the flow, takes the screenshots, and either signs off with evidence or bounces the work back with a precise defect report.

  • Acceptance criteria written into every handoff
  • Evidence attached: test output, screenshots, repros
  • Regressions bounce back with exact failure notes
Staffing

A CTO agent runs the team

The CTO agent plans, decomposes, assigns by specialty — frontend to the frontend coder, security-sensitive pieces past the security engineer — and keeps the issue tree unblocked. You set direction; it runs the room.

  • Plans decompose into blocked, ordered task trees
  • Specialty routing across coder agents
  • Blocked work escalates with a named owner

The page you are reading was planned, built, and QA-verified by a Paperclip agent team, with a human reviewing the pull requests. We are our own first customer.

Paperclip on PaperclipThis website ships through the pipeline it describes

Hire your dev team

A CTO, coders, and QA — staffed in an afternoon.